Go to contents Go to footer Go to GNB
Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

A comparative case study of regulatory approaches in the US and Korea

  • A comparative case study of regulatory approaches in the US and Korea
  • Shin, Donghee; Kim, Namchul; Yoon, Hongsuk; Jeong, Jaeyeol; Lee, Jaegil
  • Brussels, Belgium : International Telecommunications Society (ITS)
Link
Resources Content Information Item Table
Title A comparative case study of regulatory approaches in the US and Korea
Author Shin, Donghee; Kim, Namchul; Yoon, Hongsuk; Jeong, Jaeyeol; Lee, Jaegil
Publisher Brussels, Belgium : International Telecommunications Society (ITS)
Publication Date 2014 - 06
Material Type Article
Country South Korea
United States
Holding ECONSTOR
Language English License

Abstract

In this study, we compare and contrast the U.S. and Korea in the context of network neutrality, focusing on debates among stakeholders and regulatory approaches. Interesting similarities and differences are highlighted by comparisons within the broadband ecosystem framework: government functions, histories, people's perceptions, regulatory approaches, legislative initiatives, and implementation. In Korea, there is an existing regulatory framework with suggestive guidelines that can be used to address net neutrality in a case-bycase fashion. The U.S. follows a regulatory approach by creating enforceable nondiscrimination rules. Our findings suggest that the issue is not only complicated, but also as complex and vague as the parties' diverse interests are. We conclude that a careful combination of government coordination and market forces is an effective way to govern net neutrality.

User Note

25th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Brussels, Belgium, 22-25 June 2014

0 Comment

(0/400) byte
Back to top