콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Government and Law Public Administration

Print

주요 규제에 대한 규제품질의 비교 및 분석(A comparative analysis on the quality of regulations on starting business in OECD countries) : OECD 국가들의 중소기업창업관련 규제를 중심으로

Related Document
Frame of Image 고자 하 였습니 다. 이를 위하 여 이 연구 는 규제품 질의 규범 적인 지 표를 선정 하여 OECD국가들과의 중소기업 창업관련 규제품질의 수준을 비교하고, 주요 국들이 규 제품질 을 향상 시키기 위 하여 어떠 한 노력을 하고 있 으며 , 그러 한 노력 이 규제의 품질 향 상에 어 떤 영향을 미치었 는가 를 살 펴보았 습니다 . 이러 한 비교 분석을 통하여 우리나 라 중소 기업 의 품질 에 대한 평가 및 함 축적인 의 미에 대하 여 논하였 습니다 . 따라서 이 연구는 규 제품질 의 제고를 위 한 우리 나라의 노 력이 어느 정도이 며 우리 가 어떤 시 점에 있 는가를 한번 점검 할 수 있 는 기회 를 가져 볼 수 있다 는 것에 의의가 있다고 하 겠습니 다 . 아 무쪼 록 이 보고서 가 중소기 업관련 공무원 및 학계 등 에 도움 이 되기 를 기대 합니다 . 끝으 로 이 연구 를 책임 맡아 수 행한 김 명환 박사 와 연 구에 참여한 유종선 연 구원 및 연구수 행에 도 움을 주신 관계 전 문 가와 실무자 여러분께 깊은 감사를 드립니다.
2005년 12월
國
究
金
ⅰ
차
례
Ⅰ. 서 론 ················································································ 1
1. 연구의 목적 ·························································································· 1 2. 연구대상 ································································································· 3 3. 연구범위 및 방법 ··············································································· 4 4. 기대효과 ································································································· 5
Ⅱ. 규제의 품질에 대한 이론적 고찰과 지표선정 ····· 7
1. 규제개혁에 대한 일반적인 논의 ··················································· 7 1) 규제개혁이 필요성 ··········································································· 7 2) 규제 개혁의 당위성 ········································································ 8 3) 규제개혁의 방향 ············································································· 1 2 2. 규제품질에 관한 논의 ··················································


Full Text
Title 주요 규제에 대한 규제품질의 비교 및 분석(A comparative analysis on the quality of regulations on starting business in OECD countries)
Similar Titles
Sub Title

OECD 국가들의 중소기업창업관련 규제를 중심으로

Material Type Reports
Author(Korean)

김명환

Publisher

서울:한국행정연구원

Date 2005-12
Pages 120
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Documents
Original Format pdf
Subject Government and Law < Public Administration
Holding 한국행정연구원

Abstract

It is necessary to be reformed if government regulation on business activities is a reflection of our old administrative culture and if it is likely to work as a key factor to hamper honest and normal business activities. As a way of regulatory reform, Korean governments have mainly depended on quantitative approach focused on reducing the total number of regulations themselves. It is the time to take into account that such attempt, however, must be shifted to the consideration of better regulation to enhance the quality of regulation. It is critical to think over and review every regulation whether or not it is necessary to provide the rules of business activities and how we make this regulation work more effective.

Despite of its importance in national economy, in particular,ssmall-and medium sized businessecompanies have less been highlighted, compared with big corporations, and they have had difficult times due to depression. In this context, this study is aimed at exploring a venue to review the level of
regulatory quality related to business start-up and seeking a way to improve such quality, promoting the business activities of small-and medium sized companies that have shrunk.

For so doing, this study established the normative indicators of regulatory quality, compared the regulatory quality related to the business start-up of small-and medium sized companies among OECD countries. And the study also tried to illuminate what kinds of efforts OECD countries have devoted to improve regulatory quality and what impacts those efforts had to the improvement of regulatory quality. Through this comparative analysis, this study discussed the current quality of Korean regulations in starting small-and medium sized businesses and the implication of such evaluation.
As results of analyzing OECD and World Bank studies, it appeared that the Korean regulatory quality of starting small-and medium sized businesses ended up being ranked in the lowest group among OECD countries. Those studies commonly showed that the number of administrative procedures required and the cost are pretty high, while the duration is relatively short when a entrepreneur registers his or her company in Korea. This might imply that, by and large, Korea has a rather difficult regulatory environment to start a small-and medium sized company, and that therefore such environment is apt to work as an obstacle to sound economic activities.

Finally, it is still necessary to take consideration of overall regulatory mapping, the continuous and regular review of existing regulations, and the organic cooperation with local governments in enforcement stages. In this sense, it is important for the regulatory reform of small-and medium sized businesses start-up to deregulate or remove existing regulations, in order to simplify administrative procedures. However, it is more important to make realization of regulatory criteria to be implemented and to attempt to improve regulatory quality, by evaluating how rational the criteria of regulations currently defined and how effective the enforcement methods of regulations are.