콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Government and Law Public Administration

Print

참여정부 정부혁신의 보편성과 독자성(A study on the Korean participatory government's strategy of reinventing government) : 해외 정부혁신 사례와의 비교

Related Document
Frame of Image 를 통해 소개하고 있습니다. 선진 각국이 왜, 언제, 무엇 을 위하여 혁신의 항해를 시작했는지 그 이유와 방법을 논하고 있습니다. 선진국들의 경우가 우리에게 어떤 의미를 갖는지, 그 역사성과 현재성을 함께 추적하고 있습니다. 그렇게 함으로써 참 여정부가 추진하고 있는 정부혁신의 위치를 세계사적 맥락에서 자리매김하고, 참여정부 혁신의 보편성과 독자성을 규명하려고 했습니다. 아무쪼록 이 연구가 참여정부의 혁신전략과 실천논리 를 이해하고, 나아가야 할 혁신의 방향을 제시하는 유용한 자료 가 되기를 바랍니다. 끝으로 이 연구를 책임지고 수행한 은재호 박사와 연구참여 자로서 지원을 아끼지 않은 민소정 연구원, 그리고 자문에 응해 주신 혁신담당관들과 전문가 여러분들께 감사드립니다.
2005년 12월 韓國行政硏究院 院長 金 重 養
ⅰ
차
례
제 1 장 서 론 ········································································ 1
제 1 절 연구의 필요성 및 목적 ························································· 1 제 2 절 연구의 범위와 방법 ······························································· 2 제 3 절 연구의 체계 ············································································· 4
제 2 장 해외 정부혁신의 내용과 특징 ·························· 6
제 1 절 정부혁신의 연속성과 상보성 ··············································· 6 1. 후복지국가 정부혁신의 패러다임 : 거버넌스 ························ 6 2. 거버넌스 패러다임의 구성 ························································ 12 3. 거버넌스 패러다임의 비교 ························································ 21 제 2 절 신공공관리 ············································································· 23 1. 영국의 행정개혁 : 신공공관리론의 창안 ······························ 24 2. 뉴질랜드 정부혁신 : 신공공관리론의 실습장 ······················ 30 3. 미국 정부혁신 : 행정 프로세스 개혁 ···································· 33 제 3 절 정책네트워크 ········································································· 42 1. 네덜란드 : 사회협약을 통한 개혁 ····································


Full Text
Title 참여정부 정부혁신의 보편성과 독자성(A study on the Korean participatory government's strategy of reinventing government)
Similar Titles
Sub Title

해외 정부혁신 사례와의 비교

Material Type Reports
Author(Korean)

은재호

Publisher

서울:한국행정연구원

Date 2005-12
Pages 117
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Documents
Original Format pdf
Subject Government and Law < Public Administration
Holding 한국행정연구원

Abstract

One of the major agendas set by and for Participatory Government is the Government Innovation. The connotation of Government Innovation is very variable according to authors and actors, but one thing clear is that its ultimate goal is to promote State's competitiveness and Citizens' life quality.
The Participatory Government shares also this universal goal and collective value. As it is revealed by the five goals of Government Innovation (efficiency, service first, transparency, decentralization, participation), the Participatory Government employs multiples standards of government reinvention strategies : New Public Management and Policy network. It seems that this first choice permit to find or construct a meaningful path maybe unique to Korean governmental practices.
But, it may not be useless to note here that the Participatory Government is aiming at a 'better government', denying a 'small government' that prevailed both in past Korean governments and Anglo-saxon or American governments (UK, New Zealand, USA, etc). On the contrary, it seeks vigorously to play an active role of 'coordinator' between civil society (citizens) and enterprises (market). It
seems that this second choice relies on the observation of Korean historical background : Korea has never constructed a welfare State which caused financial deficit and, therefore, never known a big government ; the actual problems of Korean society, notably the impartial distribution of richness,
are not due to government failure, but market failure.