콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Government and Law Public Administration

Print

규제영향분석 표준사례작성(Framing standardized cases of regulatory impact analysis)

Related Document
Frame of Image 서 이 연구는 규제의 분야별 특성이나 유형에 보다 적 합하며 구체적인 규제영향분석이 실시되고, 규제영향분석을 직접 담당하는 공무원들의 규제영향분석에 대한 실용성과 전 문성을 제고시킴과 동시에 규제영향분석 담당공무원의 업무 의 편리성과 효율성을 향상시키는데 도움을 줄 것으로 기대 합니다. 규제품질의 제고를 위한 우리나라의 노력이 어느 정 도이며 우리가 어떤 시점에 있는가를 한번 점검할 수 있는 기회를 가져볼 수 있다는 것에 의의가 있다고 하겠습니다. 아 무쪼록 이 보고서가 관련 공무원 및 학계 등에 도움이 되기
를 기대합니다. 끝으로 이 연구의 책임을 맡아 수행한 김명환 박사와 연구를 지원한 서성아 전문연구원 및 연구수행에 도 움을 주신 관계 전문가와 실무자 여러분께 깊은 감사를 드립 니다.
2006년 12월
韓國行政硏究院 院長 鄭 用 德
<제목 차례>
제 1장 서 론 ············································································ 1
제1절 연구의 의의 및 목적 ··························································· 1 제2절 연구범위 및 방법 ································································· 4
제 2장 규제영향분석의 이론적 고찰 ································ 7
제1절 규제의 개념과 유형 ····························································· 7 1. 규제의 개념 ·············································································· 7 2. 규제의 유형 ·············································································· 8 3. 규제의 의도하지 않은 결과 ················································ 11 제2절 규제영향분석의 개관 ························································· 12 1. 규제영향분석의 개념 및 의의 ············································ 12 2. 규제영향분석의 기능 ···························································· 13 3. 규제영향분석제도의 운영구조와 체계 ······························ 17 4. 규제영향분석의 원칙, 성과기준 및 실행전략 ···············18 제3절 규제영향분석의 접근법 ····················································· 21 1. 비용편익 분석 ··································


Full Text
Title 규제영향분석 표준사례작성(Framing standardized cases of regulatory impact analysis)
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Author(Korean)

김명환

Publisher

서울:한국행정연구원

Date 2006-12
Pages 481
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Documents
Original Format pdf
Subject Government and Law < Public Administration
Holding 한국행정연구원

Abstract

Regulatory impact analysis(RIA) is a series of processes that analyze possible impacts caused by regulations in a systemic and practical manner and provide information with policymakers as a objective rationale of regulatory policymaking. It is an important tool of managing regulatory quality. In Korea RIA was introduced in 1998, in order to refrain the unnecessary creation of new regulations, to minimize social costs incurred, and to enhance the efficiency of regulatory implementation.
Unlike the initial intention, however, sufficient analyses have not been implemented due to the lack of time, money and personnel. This has led to drawing inaccurate findings in analyzing regulatory impacts. Because of this, the RIA conducted have not contributed much to minimizing uncertainty in future, providing the rationale for the validity of regulations, and enhancing the comparability between regulatory alternatives.
To solve this problem and improve the level of RIA, previous studies focused on offering the textbook or the guideline of RIA. These studies, however, ignored the contexts to be considered in conducting RIA, such as regulatory types and characteristics. In this respect, this study attempts to elevate the practicability, relevance and avaliability of RIA by presenting a model which enable to make out a standarized case in accordance with regulatory areas.
For doing so, this study conducts a theoretical review, including the concept, approach, and method of RIA. And then, the study discusses the characteristics of regulations of such areas as finance, energy industry, industrial safety and food safety, and analyzes regulatory impact statements made out from January 1st in 2005 to June 30th in 2006.
The study puts a primary focus on analyzing what problems there were in writing regulatory impact statements by evaluating factors. It also presents the foreign cases of regulatory impact analysis which may help public officials understand how regulatory impact statement should be written. Finally, it offers standardized cases of four areas mentioned above in accordance with newly revised guideline of regulatory impact analysis and discusses the utilities and implications of such cases.
The study expects to contribute to public officials' implementing more concrete and appropriate regulatory impact analysis, helping them consider the contexts of their own areas. This may contribute to paving a way to implementing rational regulatory reform.