콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Social Welfare

Print

공적연금제도의 평가와 정책과제(2)

Related Document
Frame of Image 연금연구센터 책임연구원 한국보건사회연구원 선임연구위원 공무원연금연구센터 소장 공무원연금연구센터 주임연구원
목
차
제1장 서 언 · · ·· · ·· ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· ·· · · 1 제2장 국민연금 재정방식과 재정평가기준의 모색 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8
제1절 서 론 · ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ·· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ·· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ·· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· 8 제2절 국민연금의 장기 재정상태 · · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · 11 1. 분석을 위한 인구 및 경제변수 가정 · · · · · ·· · · · · · · ·· · · · · · · · ·· · · · · · · ·· · · · · 11 2. 국민연금의 장기 재정상태 · · ·· · ·· · ·· · · ·· · ·· · ·· · · ·· · ·· · ·· · · ·· · ·· · ·· · · ·· · ·· · ·· · 15 제3절 국민연금의 지출비용 분석 · · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · 19 제4절 공적연금의 재정방식과 재정평가 · · ·· · · ·· · · ·· · · ·· · · ·· · · ·· · · ·· · · ·· · · ·· · 22 1. 재정평가지표 ········································································ 22 2. 주요국의 공적연금 재정방식과 재정평가 ······························ 24 3. 재정목표와 재정지속가능성 ······················ ····················· ······· 28 제5절 국민연금의 재정평가 ························ ························ ········ 30 1. 국민연금의 재정방식 ·········· ········· ·········· ········· ·········· ········· ··· 30 2. 2008년 재정계산의 재정평가 ·· ·· ··· ·· ·· ·· ··· ·· ·· ··· ·· ·· ·· ··· ·· ·· ··· ·· ·· ·· ··· 32 제6절 재정평가기준의 모색과 적용 ···· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· · 35 1. 재정지속가능성의 조건 ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ··


Full Text
Title 공적연금제도의 평가와 정책과제(2)
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Publisher

서울:한국개발연구원

Date 2008-12
Series Title; No 우리나라 노후소득보장체계 구축에 관한 종합연구
Pages 264
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Documents
Original Format pdf
Subject Social Development < Social Welfare
Holding KDI; KDI School

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the emerging Chinese economy on production and investment in Korea’s manufacturing industry by route and time series, drawing policy implications.
Since the 1990s, China’s fast growth and integration in the world economy has become a major challenge for many countries in East Asia, including Korea. In the last 20 years, the Chinese economy has achieved rapid economic growth that averaged up to 10% each year. It presently stands as third in economic power, second in exports, and Korea’s primary trading partner. To grow Korea’s economy and China’s investment demand, it is important to understand the relative importance between capital goods, machinery and parts export, as well as routes for exporting intermediary goods to the third country. If exports in intermediary goods increase with China’s recent emergence in the economy, this could translate into an opportunity for Korea to act as a production base or medium for the Chinese economy. However, if capital goods or exports in machinery and parts increase in demand, this could mean that only the Chinese economy will absorb Korea’s exports. In the case of the latter scenario, a stable trade relationship between Korea and China would be critical in stabilizing Korea’s economic growth.
There are both negative and positive effects of the increase in export and competition between domestic manufacturing producers and Chinese producers. Overall, the negative effects were noticeable before the economic crisis, but were somewhat relieved afterwards. The positive effects became clearer after the economic crisis. In particular, before the economic crisis, import competition from China decreased productivity and the investment rate of the Korean manufacturing industry. Post-crisis productivity and investment rates showed improvement. The positive effects of increased competition with China could mainly be seen in capital goods and machinery parts exports to China, which grew even stronger after the economic crisis. The export cost of these sectors increased the productivity of the manufacturing industry.
As the recent export structure has become increasingly high-tech, to minimize the negative effects of China’s rapid growth and elicit maximum benefits, Korea must distinguish itself with advancements in the arenas of technology and human resource management. Also, since China’s export demand essentially supports the growth of Korea’s manufacturing industry, securing a stable trade relationship between the two countries is important.