Despite government attempts to enhance national competitiveness and government efficiency through government performance evaluation, problems remained pervasive as government failed to achieve its goals.
In addition, questions have risen regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of self-evaluation and specific evaluation which are the two pillars of government performance evaluation, and the reliabilities of the results of those evaluations.
Likewise, in order to effectively operate government performance evaluation, there emerged the importance of meta-evaluation, an in-depth reevaluation of evaluation. Ultimately, meta-evaluation can lead to improving evaluation quality, which in turn leads to strengthening evaluation capacity and ensuring the efficiency of governmental policy operation by improving evaluation reports.
Eventually, a review of “how to perform meta-evaluation” is needed for meta-evaluation to play its role effectively.
정부업무평가에 대한 메타평가 및 개선방안 연구(A Study on the Meta-evaluation of the Government Performance Evaluation)
서울 : 한국행정연구원
|Series Title; No||KIPA 연구보고서 / 2012-15|
|Subject Country||South Korea(Asia and Pacific)|
|Subject||Government and Law < Public Administration|