콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠
  • HOME
  • SEARCH
PLUS Text Size MINUS RESET
FACEBOOK TWITTER Linked In

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Employment

Print

한국의 직업지표 연구(2015)

Related Document
Frame of Image 히 미국, 독일, 일본 등 선진국과의 비교 관점에서 우리나라 직업세계의 현재를 탐구하려 는 자세는 매우 흥미롭기까지 합니다. 이 연구는 한국직업능력개발원 한상근 선임연구위원이 책임을 맡아 수행하였고, 장혜정 연구위원, 장주희 부연구위원, 장현진 부연구위원, 윤수린 연구원 등이 공동연구원으로 참여했습니다. 제1장과 제2장은 한상근 박사가, 제3장, 제5장, 제6장은 한상근 박사, 장혜정 박사, 장 주희 박사, 장현진 박사, 윤수린 연구원 등이 공동으로 집필하였고, 제
4장은 한상근 박사와 장현진 박사가 책임을 지고 집필에 참여하였다. 김슬기 위촉연구원은 각국의 직업 현황 자료를 수집하고 직업지표 조 사 결과를 분석하고 연구 보고서를 정리하는 데 큰 역할을 수행하였 습니다. 아무쪼록 본 연구 결과가 청소년들과 일반 국민들의 직업 선 택에 큰 도움이 되기를 기대합니다.
2015년 12월
한국 직 업능 력 개발 원 원장 이 용순
차례 i
제목 차례
요약
제1장 서 론_1
제1절 연구의 필요성 및 목적 ··················································· 3 제2절 연구 내용 및 연구의 한계 ············································· 7
제2장 연구 방법 및 선행 연구 검토_11
제1절 연구 방법 ······································································· 13 제2절 선행 연구 ······································································· 26 제3절 연구 대상 국가 및 직업 선정 ······································ 37 제4절 조사 대상 직업에 관한 사전 분석 ······························ 47
제3장 주요국의 사회경제적 환경 분석_49
제1절 미국 ················································································ 51 제2절 독일 ················································································ 64 제3절 일본 ················································································ 75 제4절 한국 ················································································ 85 제5절 소결 ················································································ 95
제4장 주요국의 기초 직업지표 분석_101
제1절 응답자의 특성 ···········································


Full Text
Title 한국의 직업지표 연구(2015)
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Author(Korean)

한상근; 장혜정; 장주희; 장현진; 윤수린

Publisher

세종 : 한국직업능력개발원

Date 2015-12
Series Title; No 기본연구 / 2015-17
ISBN 979-11-5940-864-9 93310
Pages 437
Subject Country United States(Americas)
Japan(Asia and Pacific)
South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Germany(Europe)
Language Korean
File Type Documents
Original Format pdf
Subject Social Development < Employment
Holding 한국직업능력개발원
License

Abstract

Detailed objectives of this study are as follows:
First, calculate occupational index for major occupations in Korea, the USA, Germany, Japan, and so forth.
Second, analyze issues about skill, balance between work and family, short-term labor, qualification and training based on major countries’ workforce investigation result.
Third, analyze not only economic conditions in Korea, the USA, Germany, Japan, and so on, but also culture and system related with occupation.
Fourth, suggest an alternative for improving workforce professionalism and labor condition based on major countries’ occupational index investigation result.
Main methods of this study are literature review, survey, conducting a seminar, and so forth. Survey is the core method of this study. We performed a survey to calculate the occupational index for major workforces in Korea, the USA, Germany, and Japan. Survey method is web-based and goal of respondents is 4,000 people in four countries. Investigation period is from 19th of May, 2015 to
8th of July, 2015.
To review overall basic occupational index value in each country’s 20 jobs, lawyer, medical specialist, elementary school teacher, education manager, and accountant were in the top five in case of Korea. In the USA, electrical engineer ranked third and elementary school teacher dropped out of the top five. In Japan, reporter ranked fifth and accountant dropped out of the top five. Germany presented a great contrast to the other three countries. In Germany, medical specialist ranked at the top. Next came electrical engineer, web developer, education manager, insurance salesperson and so on.
To sum it all up, Korea and Japan’s index were lower than Germany and the USA especially employment stability, development possibility, job professionalism, and so forth.
To review overall basic occupational index value in each country’s 20 jobs after ten year’s prospect, education manager was the top prospect of future. Next came elementary school teacher, electrical
engineer and nurse. In the USA, accountant ranked second, lawyer ranked third, carpenter ranked fifth and elementary school teacher, nurse, fashion designer dropped out of the top five. In Germany, web developer ranked first, medical specialist ranked third, accountant ranked fourth and education manager, elementary school teacher, electrical engineer dropped out of the top five. In Japan, medical specialist was the top prospect of future. Next came elementary school teacher and electrical engineer. More than three countries amongst observed ranked electrical engineer as in the top five after ten year’s prospect.