콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Industry and Technology Entrepreneurship

Print

Korea and the BICs (Brazil, India and China) : catching up experiences (English)

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • Korea and the BICs (Brazil, India and China) : catching up experiences (English)
  • Braga, C. A. Primo; V. Chandra; Osorio-Rodarte , I.
  • World Bank (WB)


link
Title Korea and the BICs (Brazil, India and China) : catching up experiences (English)
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Author(English)

Braga, C. A. Primo; V. Chandra; Osorio-Rodarte , I.

Publisher

World Bank (WB)

Date 2009
Language English
File Type Link
Subject Industry and Technology < Entrepreneurship

Abstract

This paper tests a neo-Schumpeterian model with industry-level data to analyze how Brazil, India, and China are catching up with South Korea뭩 technological frontier in a globalized world. The paper validates Aghion et al.뭩 inverted-U hypothesis that industries that are closer to the technological frontier innovate to escape competition while longer distances discourage innovating. It suggests that for effective catching up, distance-shortening (or innovation-enhancing) policies may be a necessary complement to liberalization. South Korea and China combined a variety of distance-shortening policies with financial subsidies to promote high tech industries and an export-led growth strategy. Post-liberalization, they leveraged swift competition to spur catch-up. In comparison, Brazil, which was as rich as South Korea, and India, which was as rich as China in 1980, are catching up more slowly. Import-substitution industrialization strategies saddled Brazil and India with a large anti-export bias, and unfocused attention to innovation-enhancing policies dampened global competitiveness. Post liberalization, many of their industries were too far behind the technological frontier to effectively benefit from competition. The catch-up experiences of Brazil, India, and China with South Korea illustrate that distance from the technological frontier matters and that the design of country-specific distance- shortening policies can be an important complement to trade liberalization in promoting catching up with richer countries.