콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Industry and Technology Science/Technology

Print

정부출연연구기관의 지속가능성 분석 및 제고방안(An analysis of sustainability of government-supported research institutes and policy recommendations)

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • 정부출연연구기관의 지속가능성 분석 및 제고방안(An analysis of sustainability of government-supported research institutes and policy recommendations)
  • Cho, Hyun-Dae; Hwang, Yong-Soo; Lee, Se-Joon; Lee, Byung-Heon; Hwang, Jungtae; Kim, Jong-Young조현대; 황용수; 이세준; 이병헌; 황정태; 김종영
  • 과학기술정책연구원


link
Title 정부출연연구기관의 지속가능성 분석 및 제고방안(An analysis of sustainability of government-supported research institutes and policy recommendations)
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Author(English)

Cho, Hyun-Dae; Hwang, Yong-Soo; Lee, Se-Joon; Lee, Byung-Heon; Hwang, Jungtae; Kim, Jong-Young

Author(Korean)

조현대; 황용수; 이세준; 이병헌; 황정태; 김종영

Publisher

서울:과학기술정책연구원

Date 2008-12
Series Title; No 정책연구 / 08-12
ISBN 978-89-6112-054-8
Pages 383
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Link
Subject Industry and Technology < Science/Technology
Holding 과학기술정책연구원

Abstract

In Korea, the government-supported research institutes (GRIs) have been
established and developed since 1966. However, the issue and debates on
their sustainability have been increased, because GRIs have inherently
weakness in terms of sustainability supported by not market but government,
compared with R&D systems of universities and companies. Hence, this
research tries to analyze the sustainability of GRIs and presents some policy
recommendations to increase the sustainability of GRIs on the basis of the
analysis results.
Through extensive review of literature on the sustainability and research on
GRIs, the following six analytical variables are identified and then examined
empirically: Institutional appropriateness, resource affluence, R&D
differentiation, resource dependency, R&D productivity, and linkage/
openness. According to the analysis results, the institutional appropriateness
of GRIs is not high because of policy inconsistence and discrepancy of
opinions between expert group and policy maker group. However, the
resource affluence of GRIs is not bad because R&D investment has been increased nationally and governmentally. But the R&D differentiation of
GRIs has been decreased because university labs have come into the R&D
areas of GRIs.