콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠
  • HOME
  • SEARCH
PLUS Text Size MINUS RESET
FACEBOOK TWITTER Linked In

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Education

Print

Korea elementary-middle school pilot project

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • Korea elementary-middle school pilot project
  • Witherell, Ronald A.; Morgan, Robert M. et al.; USAID(Bur. for Program and Policy Coordination)
  • United States Agency for International Development


link
Title Korea elementary-middle school pilot project
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Author(English)

Witherell, Ronald A.; Morgan, Robert M. et al.; USAID(Bur. for Program and Policy Coordination)

Publisher

[Washington, D.C.] : United States Agency for International Development

Date 1981-09
Series Title; No Special Evaluation; AID evaluation special study / 5
Pages 96
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language English
File Type Link
Subject Social Development < Education
Holding United States Agency for International Development
License

Abstract

Although the value of Instructional Systems Design (ISD) had been proven, ISD had never been applied on a large-scale in a developing country until A.I.D. funded such an effort in the Republic of Korea (ROK) from 1972-77. This report draws several conclusions based on this success. Although converging factors -- deep cultural respect for education, a growing cadre of trained educators, an urgent need for educational reform, and a motivated government -- made the setting ideal, the project clearly proved the value of ISD to a developing country's educational system. In seeking to provide cost-effective education to prepare Korea's youth to enter the working world, the project, implemented by Florida State University, established the Korean Educational Development Institute (KEDI) to orchestrate reforms, including a modernized curriculum reflecting Korean culture and the technical needs of a growing economy; development of guides to upgrade instructors' capabilities; the introduction of Instructional Radio, Educational Television, and correspondence high schools; a rapid increase in higher education enrollment; abolition of private tutoring which had favored the wealthy; and creation of an Educational Research Information Clearinghouse and a 14-year Educational Development Plan. The report concludes that: (1) many countries need institutions such as KEDI, staffed by committed and purposeful people, to invent functionally useful educational practices; (2) flexible project execution is essential to meet changing circumstances and maintain host country support; (3) A.I.D. programs should give priority to proven technologies in which the United States leads; (4) continuity of technical assistance from a qualified source strengthens a donor's contribution; (5) in any potentially controversial project, selling the project concept is as important as good implementation; and (6) donors often attempt too much without providing adequate time and money. The evaluation methodology and a list of interviewees; notes on the authors; a 12-item bibliography (1971-81); project and education sector data; an overview of KEDI; lists of KEDI publications and visitors to KEDI; and recommendations for the ROK are appended.