콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Industry and Technology Agriculture

Print

Potato research and development in the Republic of Korea : Organization, impact and issues

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • Potato research and development in the Republic of Korea
  • Horton, D. E.; Kim, Y. C. et al.
  • United States Agency for International Development


link
Title Potato research and development in the Republic of Korea
Similar Titles
Sub Title

Organization, impact and issues

Material Type Reports
Author(English)

Horton, D. E.; Kim, Y. C. et al.

Publisher

[Washington, D.C.]:United States Agency for International Development

Date 1988
Series Title; No Other USAID Supported Study, Document
Pages 67
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language English
File Type Link
Subject Industry and Technology < Agriculture
Holding United States Agency for International Development

Abstract

Agricultural research and development programs in developing countries and the donor agencies that support them generally allocate more resources to seed programs than to any other aspect of potato improvement. The results have been mixed. Most efforts to establish conventional seed potato certification programs have encountered serious obstacles, both technical and institutional. Few seed certification programs have been able to produce more than a small portion of the seed that farmers need to plant each year. After an initial period of growth, often based on foreign funding and technical assistance, many seed programs have collapsed when foreign support was withdrawn. The Republic of Korea's early attempts at seed certification were no exception to this general rule. However, through persistence, discipline, and application of advanced techniques for in vitro multiplication and virus testing of potatoes, Korea's Seed Potato Certification Program has become a remarkable success. This report summarizes the main features of the Korean experience; it outlines the seed program's technical and institutional arrangements; it indicates the magnitude of the program's costs and benefits; and it identifies some important issues that still face the program's managers. A central conclusion is that the seed program's impact, stemming primarily from technical innovation, could now be extended by turning greater responsibility for seed production over to the private sector and by expanding efforts in the areas of breeding, postharvest technology, and on-farm research.