콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Territorial Development Environment

Print

한국의 온실가스 감축 비용에 대한 연구(A study on GHG abatement costs in Korea) : 국제배출권거래제와 주력 감축부문 선정을 중심으로(International emissions trading and major sectors of carbon reduction)

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • 한국의 온실가스 감축 비용에 대한 연구(A study on GHG abatement costs in Korea)
  • Lee, Chang-Soo; Kim, Nam-Yil이창수; 김남일
  • 대외경제정책연구원(Korea Institute for International Economy Policy)


link
Title 한국의 온실가스 감축 비용에 대한 연구(A study on GHG abatement costs in Korea)
Similar Titles
Sub Title

국제배출권거래제와 주력 감축부문 선정을 중심으로(International emissions trading and major sectors of carbon reduction)

Material Type Articles
Author(English)

Lee, Chang-Soo; Kim, Nam-Yil

Author(Korean)

이창수; 김남일

Publisher

[서울(Seoul)]:대외경제정책연구원(Korea Institute for International Economy Policy)

Date 2010-11
Journal Title; Vol./Issue 대외경제연구(Journal of East Asian Economic Integration):vol. 14(no. 2)(December 2010)
Pages 37
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Link
Subject Territorial Development < Environment
Holding 대외경제정책연구원(Korea Institute for International Econom

Abstract

In this paper, we estimate the cost of the GHG abatement target by Korean government using a trade-based model, GTAP-E, after updating all the database of industrial and trade structures as well as carbon dioxide emissions of most of regions of the world. Major findings of this paper are as follows. First, estimates of the costs, GDP and welfare costs as well as abatement cost, of the GHG abatement target differ substantially by two things: (1) assumption on carbon reductions in other countries (the reduction only in Korea or commitments with Annex I countries), (2) assumption on international emission trading. Second, governmental policy to set sectoral abatement target would increase the costs than otherwise in spite of the same level of the carbon reduction. But in the case of mild adjustments of sectoral targets by the government, the policy with more reductions in industrial sectors than private consumptions are absolutely better than the other (reducing more in private consumptions).