콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠
  • HOME
  • SEARCH
PLUS Text Size MINUS RESET
FACEBOOK TWITTER Linked In

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Social Welfare

Print

현세대 노인의 빈곤 실태 및 소득보장방안 연구(Old-age poverty in Korea and how should the government reduce it)

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • 현세대 노인의 빈곤 실태 및 소득보장방안 연구(Old-age poverty in Korea and how should the government reduce it)
  • 여유진; 김미곤; 권문일; 최옥금; 최준영
  • 한국보건사회연구원


link
Title 현세대 노인의 빈곤 실태 및 소득보장방안 연구(Old-age poverty in Korea and how should the government reduce it)
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Author(Korean)

여유진; 김미곤; 권문일; 최옥금; 최준영

Publisher

서울 : 한국보건사회연구원

Date 2012-10
Series Title; No 연구보고서 / 2012-31
ISBN 978-89-8187-959-4 93330
Pages 194
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Link
Subject Social Development < Social Welfare
Holding 한국보건사회연구원
License

Abstract

This study aims to propose workable and effective models of old-age income protection. For this purpose, the authors looked into the poverty situations of the current elderly in Korea and their socioeconomic consequences, and examined how a selected number of OECD countries tackle problems concerning old-age poverty. The findings suggest first that poverty rate is significantly higher among one-person elderly households than among elderly-couple households. Second, broad though the Basic Old-age Pension may be in its coverage, its benefit level is considered far less than appropriate. On the other hand, both the Old-age Pension and the National Basic Social Security provide relatively generous benefits, but they cover only 31.1% and 9.4%, respectively, of the elderly population. Third, a number of OECD countries, including Canada, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK, are found to provide an amount equivalent to 20~30% of average worker’s income to their senior citizens in the forms of means-tested supplementary benefit, Basic Pension, Guaranteed Minimum Pension. The policy suggestions we make in this study boil down to two things: i) broaden the beneficiary base of the National Pension while strengthening public assistance programs as a supplemental income protection scheme, and; ii) establish outside the National Pension another income protection pillar with the primary objective of reducing poverty among the elderly. The first option, while likely to be more target-efficient, but may well be regarded as less fair, inter-generationally and intra-generationally, than expected of a public income protection scheme. The second can be highly effective, but more costly and less target-efficient.