콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Social Welfare

Print

중앙과 지방의 사회복지 재원분담(Intergovernmental fiscal relationship for financing social expenditure)

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • 중앙과 지방의 사회복지 재원분담(Intergovernmental fiscal relationship for financing social expenditure)
  • 최성은; 신혜란; 한창완; 강지원; 이기주
  • 한국보건사회연구원


link
Title 중앙과 지방의 사회복지 재원분담(Intergovernmental fiscal relationship for financing social expenditure)
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Author(Korean)

최성은; 신혜란; 한창완; 강지원; 이기주

Publisher

서울:한국보건사회연구원

Date 2012-10
Series Title; No 연구보고서 / 2012-22
ISBN 978-89-8187-950-1 93330
Pages 196
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Link
Subject Social Development < Social Welfare
Holding 한국보건사회연구원

Abstract

The study examines social expenditure and revenue structure of local governments by local government type and the problems in intergovernmental relationship of central government and local governments, giving policy suggestions for solving issues regarding intergovernmental financial conflict with respect to social expenditure. The locus of this study is on all 233 local governments from 2004 to 2010, and the focus is on the whole grant-in-aids of social welfare services. The result of the analysis of inequality degree in the matching burdens of local governments in social welfare service charges shows three aspects. Along with the improvement of these institutional aspect, intergovernmental fiscal relationship for financing social expenditure of central government and local government need to strengthen of earmarking in large category and to buffer the earmarking into individual business through comprehensive subsidies in social service. First, central government need to increase subsidies for programs which is considered as central government's responsibilities by national minimum standard, such as National Basic Livelihood Programs, and Child-care Subsidies except childcare services. This can be achieved by lowering matching rates for the local government and improving the differential rates of subsidy. Second, Differentiation strategy in municipalities is needed. Counties need to finance sharing through the general accounting and Borough that high proportion of social expenditure need to finance sharing differential applications by strengthening. Third, Local business depending on the nature of the local area need to introduce the comprehensive aids to strengthen local government’s discretionary power to operate with autonomy and diversity.