S&T policy long treated as a sector policy is now solidifying its position as an infrastructure innovation policy that forms the foundation for many different policies. There is a growing need for enhancing the linkage and integration between policies by strengthening planning and coordination functions of the government organizations in charge of innovation policy. The major countries including Japan, U.S., Finland elevated planning and coordination roles and emphasized the interaction between S&T-society and innovation governance in response to emergence of the third-generation innovation policy.
This study deal with several issues related STI governance from the post-catchup innovation and holistic innovation policy and examine arguments on policy measure and institution design. And then new schemes and alternatives of 1)governance design for making effective long-term vision, 2)design of policy coordination and integration mechanism, 3)design of multi-ministerial R&D Programs, 4)reorganization of S&T administration system, 5)adjustment of public research institutes governance and mission reestablishment, 6)readjustment of regional innovation governance, 7)policy measures for participatory governance in STI policy will be discussed.
- 지속가능한 과학기술혁신 거버넌스 발전 방안(Readjustment of STI governance for sustainability)
- 성지은; 송위진; 정병걸; 김민수; 박미영; 정연진
지속가능한 과학기술혁신 거버넌스 발전 방안(Readjustment of STI governance for sustainability)
|Series Title; No||정책연구 / 2012-06|
|Subject Country||South Korea(Asia and Pacific)|
|Subject||Industry and Technology < Science/Technology|