콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Economy Macroeconomics
Economy Financial Policy

Print

Korean experiences of economic crisis resolution

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • Korean experiences of economic crisis resolution
  • Lee, Jong Kyu
  • The Bank of Korea


link
Title Korean experiences of economic crisis resolution
Similar Titles
Material Type Articles
Author(English)

Lee, Jong Kyu

Publisher

Seoul:The Bank of Korea

Date 2014
Series Title; No BOK Working Papers
Pages 67
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language English
File Type Link
Subject Economy < Macroeconomics
Economy < Financial Policy
Holding The Bank of Korea

Abstract

This paper tries to draw out some policy implications for restructuring the Korean economy by reviewing the experiences of economic crisis resolutions in the past.
The Republic of Korea has experienced about four episodes of economic crisis since the 1960s. This paper has examined each crisis and found out that the same factors that caused one previous crisis later brought about another crisis, and that this pattern repeated itself. This implies that the measures taken to resolve the previous crises were ultimately ineffective. Most of the past crisis resolution measures focused on disposing of the losses incurred by firms and banks through such instruments as bail-out loans. As far as macroeconomic policy is concerned, stabilization measures were introduced just when the economy had begun to stagnate after a long period of boom, and seldom contributed to preventing recurrence of crisis; rather they amplified the crisis intensity.
These results contain lessons for the currently ongoing structural adjustment policy, being promoted as a means to prevent recurrence of economic crisis. First, it should be designed in such a way as to encourage private agents to take initiative, with the government abstaining from direct intervention such as bail-out loans. This would eventually strengthen private sector capacities to overcome adverse shocks. Second, if a stabilization policy is to be used, it should be implemented in a preemptive manner, so that it can prevent an exceptional boom or wide-spread speculation.