콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Health
Social Development Education

Print

한국․중국․일본 의사 양성과정 비교 연구 (A comparative study on medical education systems in Korea, China and Japan)

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • 한국․중국․일본 의사 양성과정 비교 연구 (A comparative study on medical education systems in Korea, China and Japan)
  • Lim, Hyun-Sun; Ahn, Duck-Sun; Ahn, Sowon임현선; 안덕선; 안서원
  • 한국의학교육학회


link
Title 한국․중국․일본 의사 양성과정 비교 연구 (A comparative study on medical education systems in Korea, China and Japan)
Similar Titles
Material Type Articles
Author(English)

Lim, Hyun-Sun; Ahn, Duck-Sun; Ahn, Sowon

Author(Korean)

임현선; 안덕선; 안서원

Publisher

[Seoul, Korea]:한국의학교육학회

Date 2007
Journal Title; Vol./Issue 한국의학교육:vol. 19(no. 4)
Pages 8
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Link
Subject Social Development < Health
Social Development < Education
Holding 한국의학교육학회

Abstract

Purpose: The present study examined the possibility of standardization of medical education in three Asian countries-Korea, China, and Japan, by comparing their medical education and licensing systems. Methods: As the criterion for comparison, we divided medical education system into three stages- basic medical education, graduate medical education, and continuing medical education. In addition, we analyzed the history and social and cultural backgrounds of medical education in each country. Recent changes were also examined. Results: While little difference was found in the medical curriculums and courses between Korea and Japan, China's differed significantly from these two countries. But all three countries do attempt to keep up with international standards. Conclusion: To improve the quality of medical education in Korea, China, and Japan, these three countries need a plan to standardize medical education compatible with international standards but one that differs from western medical education by incorporating traditional medicine.