콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Health
Social Development Education

Print

의예과 교육과정 평가준거 개발 연구 (Research and development of evaluation criteria for premedical curriculum)

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • 의예과 교육과정 평가준거 개발 연구 (Research and development of evaluation criteria for premedical curriculum)
  • Hwang, Jinyoung; Shin, Jwa-Seop; Yoon, Hyun-Bae; Kim, Do-Hwan; Yoo, Dong-Mi; Kim, Eun Jeong; Lee, Seung-Hee황진영; 신좌섭; 윤현배; 김도환; 유동미; 김은정; 이승희
  • 한국의학교육학회


link
Title 의예과 교육과정 평가준거 개발 연구 (Research and development of evaluation criteria for premedical curriculum)
Similar Titles
Material Type Articles
Author(English)

Hwang, Jinyoung; Shin, Jwa-Seop; Yoon, Hyun-Bae; Kim, Do-Hwan; Yoo, Dong-Mi; Kim, Eun Jeong; Lee, Seung-Hee

Author(Korean)

황진영; 신좌섭; 윤현배; 김도환; 유동미; 김은정; 이승희

Publisher

[Seoul, Korea]:한국의학교육학회

Date 2015-12
Journal Title; Vol./Issue 한국의학교육학회지:vol. 27(no. 4)
Pages 11
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Link
Subject Social Development < Health
Social Development < Education
Holding 한국의학교육학회

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop criteria to evaluate a premedical curriculum to ultimately improve the quality of premedical education. Methods: The first draft of the evaluation criteria was developed through a literature review and expert consultation. The Delphi survey was conducted to ensure the validity of the draft. Results: The final premedical curriculum criteria consisted of three evaluation areas (curriculum development, curriculum implementation, and curriculum outcome), five evaluation items (educational objective, organization of curriculum, instructional method, class management, and educational outcome), and 18 evaluation indicators. Conclusion: There should be further discussion on the evaluation questionnaire and the content for each evaluation indicator with regard to its practical application. Also, a concrete evaluation system, including evaluation standards and rating scales, should be developed.