콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠
  • HOME
  • SEARCH
PLUS Text Size MINUS RESET
FACEBOOK TWITTER Linked In

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Employment

Print

임금피크제 도입운영에 관한 비교법적 검토 (Comparative review on the introduction and operation of salary peak system) : 한국과 일본을 중심으로 (Focusing on Korea and Japan)

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • 임금피크제 도입운영에 관한 비교법적 검토 (Comparative review on the introduction and operation of salary peak system)
  • Noh, Jae-Chul
  • 한국콘텐츠학회


link
Title 임금피크제 도입운영에 관한 비교법적 검토 (Comparative review on the introduction and operation of salary peak system)
Similar Titles
Sub Title

한국과 일본을 중심으로 (Focusing on Korea and Japan)

Material Type Articles
Author(English)

Noh, Jae-Chul

Publisher

[대전] : 한국콘텐츠학회

Date 2015
Journal Title; Vol./Issue 한국콘텐츠학회논문지:vol.15(issue 11)
Pages 14
Subject Country Japan(Asia and Pacific)
South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Link
Subject Social Development < Employment
Holding 한국과학기술정보연구원
License

Abstract

In this study, it has an intention of arranging an implication based on an effective introduction of a wage peak system in Japan to settle a mandatory retirement at sixty according to a legalization of retirement age at sixty smoothly. Institutionally, retirement age guaranteed type that reduces wage from certain period before retirement is of great importance. In Japan, mainly features the extension of retirement age that focus on keeping aged employment after retirement. In the introduction of the wage peak system, Korea attaches importance to the wage cost savings, but Japan puts emphasis on using aging workforce. Korea wants to promote the aged employment for retirement age at 60, whereas Japan actively push ahead with retirement age 65 and after that time. South Korea needs to reinforce the pensionable age and the connection though the extension of retirement age via the manpower utilization, employment promotion and the stability. (The rest omitted)