콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠
  • HOME
  • SEARCH
PLUS Text Size MINUS RESET
FACEBOOK TWITTER Linked In

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Health
Social Development Social Welfare

Print

전염병관리 관련법령의 변화 추이분석 및 향후 개정방향에 관한 연구(The amendment tendency analysis of the Korean infectious disease prevention act and a recommendation for the next amendment)

Related Document
Frame of Image
  • 전염병관리 관련법령의 변화 추이분석 및 향후 개정방향에 관한 연구(The amendment tendency analysis of the Korean infectious disease prevention act and a recommendation for the next amendment)
  • 황창용; 오희철; 이덕형; 박기동; 이종구
  • 보건복지부


link
Title 전염병관리 관련법령의 변화 추이분석 및 향후 개정방향에 관한 연구(The amendment tendency analysis of the Korean infectious disease prevention act and a recommendation for the next amendment)
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Author(Korean)

황창용; 오희철; 이덕형; 박기동; 이종구

Publisher

[서울] : 보건복지부

Date 2018
Journal Title; Vol./Issue 예방의학회지:vol.31(no.3)
Pages 24
Subject Country South Korea(Asia and Pacific)
Language Korean
File Type Link
Original Format pdf
Subject Social Development < Health
Social Development < Social Welfare
Holding NDSL
License

Abstract

This Study has been carried out to make a recommendation for the next amendment of the Infectious Disease Prevention Act with a specific focus on the kind of notifyable disease. Korean, Japanese, German, U.S, English and French acts on infectious diseases prevention were reviewed, compared with and analized in regards of numbers and kinds of notifyable infectious diseases and their tendency of amendments.
An criteria was designed to assess the level of validity of diseases to be designated in the act. Four times, the fatality (greater than 10% to not), the possibility to make a big epidemic, the availability of efficient vaccination and the usefulness of isolation, are used in the assessment. This index is applied to the diseases in Korean and other countries' Infectious Disease Prevention Acts.
Results are as follows:
1. The Korean Infectious Disease Prevention Act has a unique way of classifying the notifyable infectious disease, that is, the first, the second and the third class. But the author cannot find the basis of classification. No other countries reviewed have the similar classification.
2. The ten diseases, cholera, plague, yellow fever, diphtheria, typhoid fever, poliomyelitis, rabies, tetanus, malaria, and meningococcal meningitis are designated as the notifyable diseases not only in Korea but also in Japan, Germany, United States, England and France.
3. Thirty seven diseases including small pox, Lassa fever, anthrax, influenza, German measles, Legionellosis, infection with E. coli 0157:H7, Q-fever, brucellosis, Lyme disease are designated as legal disease at least one of the above mentioned countries.
4. The Korea has been coped with the change of the infectious disease occurrence for last fifty years in amendment of the Infectious Disease Prevention Act.
5. Japan has a special infectious surveillance system composed of 3,880 clinics throughout the whole country.
6. Germany has classified infectious disease in five categories which are based on seriousness of disease. Any confirmed death, cases and suspected cases in class Ⅰ should be reported within 24 hours. But only confirmed death and cases in class Ⅱ, but not suspected cases, are repotable in Germany.
7. Plague, bacillary dysentery, pertussis, mumps, Japanese encephaltis and Korean hemorrhagic fevers are diseases with high credits validity index among Korean legal disease.
8. German measles, anthrax, E. coli 0157:H7 infection, Lassa fever, Q-fever, brucellosis are high in vaildity index among those which are not designated in Korea but designated in other countries.
In conclusion, the Korean Infectious Disease Prevention Act has well been coped with the changes of infectious disease occurrence for last fifty years, but the classification basis and the vaildity of diseases to be designated as legal diseases is worth reevaluating.