콘텐츠 바로가기
로그인
컨텐츠

Category Open

Resources

tutorial

Collection of research papers and materials on development issues

home

Resources
Social Development Education

Print

Continuing Vocational Education and Training Policy

Related Document
Frame of Image

Continuing Vocational Education and Training Policy06



Full Text
Title Continuing Vocational Education and Training Policy
Similar Titles
Material Type Reports
Date 2015
Language Korean
File Type Theme
Subject Social Development < Education

Abstract

A. Paradigm Shift of Vocational Training System

A.1.) Introduction of Employment Insurance System




As the Korean economy has transformed from labor-intensive modes to technology-intensive ones the importance of innovation increased in the 1990s, need for upgrading skills of existing workers became increasingly crucial. In this policy context, Korea introduced the ##3D_LAYER##Employment Insurance System (EIS)##3D_TEXT:1) Yoo et al. (2005). Labour market trends and the employment insurance system in Korea. Korea Labor Institute.##3D_LINK:https://www.kdevelopedia.org/Resources/social-development/labour-market-trends-employment-insurance-system-korea--05201211130123178.do?fldIds=TP_SOC|TP_SOC_EM#.VgNkRtLtlHw##3D_TEXT:2) [Web-link] Employment Insurance System - Republic of Korea.##3D_LINK:https://www.kdevelopedia.org/Resources/social-development/employment-insurance-system-republic-korea--05201512230142753.do?fldIds=TP_SOC|TP_SOC_ED#.VnoiiuasVHU##3D_TEXT:3) [Web-link] Statutes of the Republic of Korea - Employment Insurance Act.##3D_LINK:https://www.kdevelopedia.org/Resources/social-development/employment-insurance-act--05201512230142752.do?fldIds=TP_SOC|TP_SOC_ED#.Vnoiq-asVHU##3D_LAYER_END####3D_LAYER##[1]##3D_TEXT:Human Resource Development (HRD) Service of Korea website##3D_LINK:https://www.hrdkorea.or.kr/ENG##3D_LAYER_END## in 1995, which is the backbone of the continuing VET system in Korea.



EIS consists of 3 components:-


(1) employment security program, which provide subsidy for maintaining employment status of worker;


(2) unemployment benefits program, which provides living expenses for the unemployed; and


(3) vocational competence development program (VCDP), which provides financial assistance to:-


(i) employers for vocational training of their employees;##3D_LAYER##[2]##3D_TEXT:Lee et al. (2014). "In-Service Training Policy in Korea", KSP module, Ministry of Employment and Labor and KDI School.##3D_LINK:https://www.kdevelopedia.org/Resources/social-development/in-service-training-policy-korea--04201405130131826.do?fldIds=TP_SOC|TP_SOC_ED|TP_SOC_EM#.VmpgZdKLTcs##3D_LAYER_END##

(ii) individual employees; and

(iii) the unemployed for their vocational training.

Three programs are financed from Employment Insurance Fund (EIF)##3D_LAYER##[3]##3D_TEXT:EIF is collected differently by program. For the unemployment benefit program, both an employer and an employee pay insurance fee by 0.45% of an employee’s annual total wage, respectively. For the employment security and the vocational competence development programs, employers pay insurance fees by 0.25%-0.85% of their employees’ payroll depending on the number of employees.##3D_LAYER_END##.




With the EIS, vocational training in Korea has experienced big paradigm shift:-


(i) the focus of vocational training was changed from initial training to continuing training (lifelong training);


(ii) training market became open to all public and private vocational training institutes so that they have to compete with each other to attract trainees, which is expected to improve the quality of training and overall efficiency of the system;


(iii) operation mode of training system also was changed to incentive-based one, which allows employers, employees, and the unemployed to make investment decisions based on their own training needs. They can choose training institutes and programs they want in the training market. Once they get trained, they get reimbursed from the EIF; and


(iv) training area was expanded from manufacturing sector to all sectors including service sector. 



In the late 1990s, EIS played a crucial role in providing vocational training for the unemployed whose number rapidly increased due to the ##3D_LAYER##foreign currency crisis (1997–1999)##3D_TEXT:Lee, K.S. (2011). The Korean financial crisis of 1997: Onset, turnaround, and thereafter. WB and KDI.##3D_LINK:https://www.kdevelopedia.org/Resources/economy/korefinancial-crisis-1997--04201304110125755.do?fldIds=TP_ECO|TP_ECO_MA|TP_ECO_FI#.VgCtFNLtlHw##3D_LAYER_END##. Since 2000, EIS has successfully responded to ever increasing demand for continuing training of employees. 



A.2.) Vocational Training for SMEs



In 2004, ‘Worker Vocational Competency Development Act’ was enacted to provide more equitable vocational training opportunities for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and disadvantaged. For SMEs, VCDP provides:-

(i) support to SMEs that form a training consortium with other SMEs in the same industry and vocational training providers; 

(ii) support to learning activities and infra building of SMEs that try to become learning organization; and

(iii) free provision of advanced training courses that SMEs cannot take due to high prices. 



For the disadvantaged groups, general account of the Ministry of Employment and Labor supports vocational training for female family heads, unemployed youth, self-employed, and defectors from the North Korea. Recently VCDP supports more self-directed individual VT and VT for the unemployed through voucher scheme.



In addition, the new role of higher education institutions as continuing VET providers began to be emphasized. As the skills demanded became more sophisticated and diversified, colleges and universities began to provide VET programs for both employed and unemployed adults. 



B. Checking Points



The Korean case of continuing VET implies that when developing continuing VET policies, a country needs to check:-

(i) the speed and level of a country’s economic development that indicate skill demands in terms of quality and quantity, which imply the roles and responsibilities of the governments, employers, and VET providers; 

(ii) private sector’s readiness to provide training and take financial burden, vocational training provider’s capacity to provide quality training and employer’s recognition of the importance of training; 

(iii) the generation and utilization of information on the performance of VET providers and programs and changes in skill demands; and

(iv) incentives and regulations to induce individual workers’, VET providers’ and employers’ active participation in training market.